On July 14, Dallas News published an editorial regarding a
Waco detective serving on a grand jury (click
here for full article). This article raises concerns about an
active-duty detective from the Waco police department being selected for the
grand jury in McLennan County. James
Head has been a member of the Waco police force for 26 years and will now serve
as foreman of the local grand jury.
The reason this appointment is questioned is the fact that the
case involving the recent shootout with two rival motorcycle gangs outside the
Twin Peaks restaurant may be coming before the grand jury. On May 17, 177 bikers were arrested for their
involvement in the incident. Nine people
were killed. It can be presumed that
many of those that were arrested were simply present and not involved in the
actual shooting. Perhaps they were doing
what “normal people would do during a shootout - ducking for cover and getting
out of the way.”
The author’s audience is the local population interested in
fair and justified prosecution. There is
an appearance of bias on the part of the grand jury based on the named foreman’s
likely personal and professional interactions due to his job. It is reasonable to presume that Detective
Head knows many of those involved in the prosecution of this well-publicized
incident. The author is raising the
possibility that these 177 bikers that are being prosecuted may not be able to
receive a fair trial.
I believe that the author has brought up a very good
point. Although I can see the value in having
a person with law enforcement knowledge typically being beneficial on a grand
jury, I can see the possibility of a conflict of interest. However, I must disagree that this is just now becoming a concern with this high-profile case. If having an active-duty member of the police
force is a conflict in this case, it should also be a conflict in other cases
that have not garnered media attention.
I agree that fairness “at every stage” of the legal process should be
paramount to “ensure justice is properly served.” But I also
believe those standards should be for every citizen facing the legal process, not
just this high-profile case. If police
officers and the like are not excluded with every case, they should not be
excluded from this one.
No comments:
Post a Comment